Friday, June 27, 2008

Harper Tories: Party of protectionism?

We all remember reading about the 1911 general election and how Liberal Prime Minister Sir Wilfred Laurier would ultimately turn that election into a referendum on free trade in hopes Canadian voters would finally embrace reciprocity. Well, we all know how that worked out for the great statesman from Saint-Lin, Quebec.

Well, according to Maclean's scribbler Andrew Coyne, those days of federal Liberals fighting for free trade, lower taxes and individual liberty may well be back (as he sees an emerging political trend):

For fifty years or more, conservatives have also said that prices are the vital signaling device of a market economy, informing consumers, workers, investors and businesses as to the costs of different choices. But now, suddenly, they’re irrelevant. Subsidies — sorry, investments — are the new Tory orthodoxy.

We may be witnessing one of those historic exchanges in which the parties sometimes engage, where each takes on the ideological position that the other used to occupy. Just as the Liberals were once the party of free trade, and the Tories the party of protectionism, only to see those positions reversed in the 1980s, can it be that the Liberals are about to become the party of markets and tax cuts, while the Tories embrace regulations and subsidies?

It makes one wonder if we'll ever see the day when there is a true conservative party in this country. There hasn't been one yet. Geesh!

6 Comments:

At Jun 27, 2008, 11:46:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

which liberals want tax cuts. Dion=No, Shawn Graham= No and Dalton McGuinty=No

 
At Jun 28, 2008, 10:25:00 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jean Charest=Yes. Stephen Harper=Yes. But the former is conservative unlike the latter.

 
At Jun 28, 2008, 10:56:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you are in protectionist mode right now and in Politics, now is a very good time to be excatly that. I think that we are too fast to sell off the rights to our natural resources when their are hungry giants wanting them. China and India are desperate for raw materials and would swoop in and buy them so fast that we would lose control of these valuable assets. Look at most of our Oil in Alberta those are all American companies developing the tar sands and using that oil. I think that we as Canadians need to mandate and control our resources and develop the systematically so that they benefit all Canadians over a very long period of time.
It has been really ironic that lobby groups in the U.S. have been really negative about the tar sands and Alberta yet it is mostly U.S. companies.

 
At Jun 29, 2008, 8:51:00 AM , Blogger Paul said...

A true conservative party would never win an election in Canada because there are not enough true conservatives to elect them. Dalton Camp always said that it was the middle of the road in Canada to win, and despite Harpers' ideological reputation, his behavior confirms that being too "conservative" would not make him Prime Minister.

 
At Jun 29, 2008, 5:59:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

How would you know Paul? they've never tried.

 
At Jun 30, 2008, 4:42:00 AM , Blogger Paul said...

I am not quite sure, to be honest bill, what a truly conservative party would look like.

They have tried in the past, (eg Social Credit) and they did not ever receive wide popular support.

I think Canada is too diverse to actually have anyone a majority in anyone camp, and so the murky middle has to be occupied to win.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home