Tuesday, March 25, 2008

NBT launches petition to stop MLA’s fat raise

New Brunswick Taxpayer has launched a petition calling on NB Liberal Premier Shawn Graham to cancel the 4 per cent pay raise for MLA’s and to allow voters around the province to decide whether their MLA deserves a pay raise in the next general election. As well, budgets for members' allowances, committees and operations will get a 9 per cent boost in 2008-09.

Since, we the taxpayers pay their salaries, we have a right to decide what our representatives earn. In light of Mr. Graham’s poor fiscal record thus far, he shouldn’t be so confident that hardworking taxpayers will rubber stamp a 13 per cent salary and allowance increase.

â€$¢â€$¢â€$¢

CTF spokeman Adam Taylor: "the government's refusal to return the money to New Brunswickers while also setting aside another $765,000 for MLA raises shows a lack or respect for the average New Brunswicker, especially when finance ministers across the country are tightening their belts. [...] They seem to be thumbing the nose at New Brunswick taxpayers, especially with rising assessments, and hikes in hydro. [...] The fact that last year they raised income taxes, it seems a little bit disingenuous to say we need to raise income taxes to prevent our budget from going into deficit, and then turn around and post a surplus and raise MLA salaries before they roll back that tax increase. [...] the members of New Brunswick's legislature are sending the wrong message if they are considering raising their salaries according to a report that based much of its conclusions on MLA salaries elsewhere in the country. [...]To say we are going to pay ourselves comparable to what the booming western provinces are paying their politicians, yet you aren't going to see any more increases and we are going to take more from your paycheque so we can pay ourselves more."

More good stuff from Taylor
: "Not only are regular New Brunswickers not likely seeing wage increases, they are also getting less money because of tax increases. [...] Premier Graham should be giving his head a shake. [...] Everybody loves a raise. You will never find someone in the entire world who wouldn't take a pay raise. But the reality is when the government is raising taxes the last thing it should be doing is raising wages."

â€$¢â€$¢â€$¢

"If the MLAs and ministers vote in favour of the almost $800,000 pay hike package recommended by a government commissioned report, they will receive an almost 4 per cent raise as the salary of a sitting members will increase from $81,758 to $85,000.

According to the recommendations that were based on comparisons with other provinces and the input of past and current MLAs, ministers would see their salaries increase to from $122,248 to $137,613, which would raise their salaries to more than $20,000 above Saskatchewan ministers, 30,000 more than Manitoba ministers, and within the $10,000 of Alberta ministers."


Related: N.B. plans to top up pay for legislature members, Politicians In New Brunswick Could Soon Be Getting A Pay Raise, MLAs stand to profit from 'unseemly' vote - CEO, It's pay raise time, Province pegs $50M for pay hikes, Voting on a package to boost salaries a conflict.

14 Comments:

At Mar 25, 2008, 3:07:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ha! Ha! Incredible!!

 
At Mar 25, 2008, 4:34:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sure those who aren't feeding off the government trough aren't laughing.

 
At Mar 25, 2008, 8:20:00 PM , Blogger Kit said...

A 13 percent raise. Wow! Where can I get me some of that... That would just about cover the increase in my power bill, property taxes and last years tax increases...
Hey! wait a minute... I lose an additional 13 percent to the government and they get an equivalent raise... And I thought it was going to help make this province self sufficient!

 
At Mar 26, 2008, 11:52:00 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Self-sufficiency is a government sponsored marketing pipe dream. I mean honestly, they don't even have any benchmarks or program targets to measure its progress or failure over time. Which is why I ask myself, why 2025?

 
At Mar 26, 2008, 12:14:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is outrageous!!!!!!!!

 
At Mar 26, 2008, 12:57:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wasn't suggesting it was funny nbt. Yet, you have to admit, their policies definitely are.

 
At Mar 26, 2008, 4:27:00 PM , Blogger Kit said...

I suppose giving yourself a 13 percent pay raise and getting away with it while your constituents suffer from continuous incremental tax increases (that you imposed on them) - is a bench mark of sorts!?..

The only thing self sufficient in this is the ability of our elected to self increase their wages and benefits...
I wish I had the power to do that.

Adam Taylor hits the nail on the head. Rewarding oneself with a raise usually comes after clearly demonstrated productivity. Unless you count the number of studies written as being productive... or the number of people irked by arbitrary policy changes - peut etre.

now answer me this... Is there a promise they made that they haven't broken?

 
At Mar 26, 2008, 9:37:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a great question. And if anybody knows the answer feel free to answer.

 
At Mar 26, 2008, 9:38:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a great question. And if anybody knows the answer feel free to answer.

 
At Mar 29, 2008, 11:33:00 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most of Canada is becoming bogged down with too many high salaries and jobs off the public purses. I am all for good paying jobs but those of us who don't work for the public end up paying.I thought that you were called a public servant because you worked for alot less than you would in the private sector. We are already taxed at over 50% and with more raises, taxes have to go up. I think that Alberta seems to be the last province where working on the public purse pays much less than the private sector.

 
At Mar 29, 2008, 11:44:00 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

NBT- good point how do they measure this. Has the past Governments tried the same scheme?
It shows how reckless the politicians are when trying to retain power and support.

 
At Mar 29, 2008, 8:03:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Adam Taylor says it well. And furthermore, who in their right mind (in the private sector) would ever offer themselves a pay raise when their company has yet to demonstrate they can properly compete with other companies (especially when they're offereing their employees lower wages).

Sounds like something the Nortel big wigs would do.

 
At Apr 1, 2008, 1:23:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Our province has the highest income tax and is among the lowest paid salaries. Yet our MLA's and premier has some of the highest pay. Doesn't make sense at all. We all need to pack up and head west. Especially the low to middle class. That would only leave the Politicians and the Irving's to find new ways to increase their pay and profits'

 
At Apr 1, 2008, 6:10:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

anon: Great points. And it's precisely why we need a stronger economy driven by a healthy and competitive private sector.

anon: Not quite certain? Although, I know a majority of Bernard Lord's salary came from private hands (i.e. party funds).

bill: Ha! Ha! Nortel? Aren't they done yet?

anon: Taking nothing away from someone who offers themselves to the public, judging from their overall responsibilities and population they oversee, they probably shouldn't be paid just short of $10,000 less then an Albertan MLA.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home