Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Regulation by stealth

As a Libertarian, I often focus a lot of my attention on "big" government spending, regressive taxes and the like. However, I, like many others, pay very little attention to the overall effect of government regulation towards our fiscal performance and future prosperity. And as G. Bruce Doern explains in this article in the Ottawa Citizen, we definitely should be paying attention:
Carleton professor G. Bruce Doern, the Conference Board of Canada's newest scholar-in-residence, pointed out the folly of these problems in a meeting with the Citizen's editorial board. Setting regulations is as significant a function of government as taxing and spending, Mr. Doern says, but it almost always happens under the public radar. Everyone goes crazy for weeks over the federal budget, but 40 to 50 new federal regulations come into force each year with little attention.

Unless, of course, you're trying to be innovative in one of the industries affected by government regulations, in which case you're likely to find yourself spending years and millions of dollars trying to penetrate a thicket of rules, some of which might be redundant or contradictory, just to bring a product to market.

Mr. Doern proposes treating regulation with the same seriousness as we do taxing and spending, making an annual declaration of a regulatory agenda part of the normal parliamentary schedule.
(Hat tip Paul Tuns)

1 Comments:

At May 29, 2007, 8:09:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's fine if you actually feel sorry for industry. Seeing that they are making more money than ever, and sharing it with nobody, it makes it pretty hard to gather sympathy.

So for example look at the oil sector. Does anybody feel sorry for the gas companies because there are some regulations? Most people will tell you three quarters of the problem is that there aren't ENOUGH regulations.

Keep in mind that there are regulations, but that is meaningless if you have a government that doesn't enforce them anyway. Let's talk about New Brunswick, where Irving regularly breaks environments LAWS, thats laws, not just rules. Yet nothing happens, they got a $7000 fine for pleading guilty and of course fines are tax deductible.

Last year they didn't even get fined, the minister simply said 'you guys have to shape up' and the Irving spokesperson said 'we'll see what we can do'.

And New Brunswick is a perfect example of a province where very few regulations are addressed. The province passes very little legislation, and most of the recent legislation has been to relax regulations, just check out the ones that they pushed through for Irvings railroad.


So try telling New Brunswickers "poor miserable Irvings are having such an awfully hard time with all the regulations they have to jump through, why, they're barely keeping their heads above water, poor things".

I think you're preaching that message to the wrong choir.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home